Search

Environmental disposal services

Environmental disposal services for hazardous waste and debris removal

Environmental disposal services

Cost per 911 call for dispatching services

Fire and emergency medical dispatching services

Fire and emergency medical dispatching services

Purchase order for fire and emergency medical dispatching services

Fire and emergency medical dispatching services

Fire and emergency medical dispatching services

Environmental disposal services

Environmental disposal fees for hazardous waste management

Disposal bin fees for Dump Day events

Caltrans reimbursement for 100% of Dump Day costs (labor, equipment, disposal fees)

Purchase order for fire and emergency medical dispatching services

Fire and emergency medical dispatching services

Disposal fees and trash collection

Mar 17, 2026

city council

The council's largest spending action was approving Road Repair Project Phase IX, which encompasses a $5.58 million contract with Hardy & Harper, Inc. for construction and six separate line items to Bowman Infrastructure Engineers Ltd. totaling approximately $1.22 million for construction management and inspection services; the council voted specifically on a Bowman contract amendment stated in the resolution as $204,116.70, passing 4-0-1 with one abstention unnamed in the record — Bowman also held a $257,977 construction management contract approved in October 2024 for the same project type, and that identical figure reappears among the current Bowman line items. The council also approved a $98,375 contract with [Selbert Perkins Design](https://selbertperkins.com/) for municipal branding and marketing consulting services, 5-0 after council discussion; the amount falls $1,625 below the $100,000 approval threshold. The full consent agenda — including a $250,000 recurring purchase order with Springbrook Holding Company LLC for utility billing software (a vendor the city has paid continuously since at least 2009, when comparable orders were under $52,000), $182,182 to the LA Gateway Region Integrated Regional Water Management JPA for water quality monitoring, and $63,112 to Advanced Compliance Engineering for fuel pump maintenance — passed 5-0 without discussion. More than fifteen residents addressed the council during public comment on non-spending matters including pothole damage claims, parking enforcement disputes, and code enforcement concerns; no members of the public spoke to any of the spending items on the agenda.

Mar 10, 2026

city council

The council's two largest spending approvals at the March 17, 2026 meeting were a $204,116.70 amendment to an existing professional services agreement with Bowman Infrastructure Engineers Ltd. for additional construction management and inspection on road repair project phase nine—passed with four affirmative votes and one abstention—and a contract not to exceed $98,375 with Silbert Perkins Design for municipal branding and marketing consulting, passed 5-0; the Silbert Perkins amount sits $1,625 below $100,000, which analysts typically flag as a potential threshold-adjacent figure, though Compton's specific contract approval threshold is not stated in the meeting materials. Bowman Infrastructure Engineers is a repeat vendor on a multi-phase road project, with this item adding funds to an existing agreement whose original contract value is not disclosed in the available materials. A Special Legal Counsel Authorization Resolution (Item 2 on the structured agenda) was also approved as part of the consent agenda, 5-0, with no dollar amount appearing in the available materials. More than fifteen residents addressed the council during public comment on non-spending matters—including pothole damage reimbursement denials, parking enforcement disputes, code enforcement complaints, and questions about commissioner eligibility to run for office—while no members of the public addressed either the Bowman or Silbert Perkins spending items before those votes were taken.

Mar 5, 2026

personnel board

The Personnel Board held a brief special meeting that addressed open competitive recruitment for at least two positions: an inspector in the Public Works Department and a driver in the Regulation Department. Representatives from the Maintenance Division and other departments were present to provide background on the positions. Brief discussion touched on park maintenance and tree safety, with members noting progress on fallen branch removal. The meeting adjourned shortly after convening, with no contentious votes or disputes recorded in the available transcript.

Feb 24, 2026

city council

The council approved the following spending items, all by 5-0 vote: $834,365 to Sweeping Corp of America for citywide street sweeping (Measure P funds, recurring contract); $500,000 to General Pump Company for water well and booster pump services, which the water department stated covers outstanding invoices and accrued late fees the vendor agreed to defer; $495,664 to Innovative Playgrounds Co., Inc. (Measure A) for the Tucker Park playground project; $237,900 to Angeles Contractor, Inc. to close out the Council Chambers remodeling; $95,740 to Cooperative Personnel Services DBA CPS HR Consulting for training and consulting; $50,000 to Mars Environmental for disposal services; and a three-year uniform rental contract with Cintas Corporation not to exceed $120,000 (consent, 5-0). The CPS HR Consulting approval carries a structural flag: the single agenda item lists three sub-threshold line items — $95,740, $95,470, and $45,470 — each sitting just below the $100,000 or $50,000 approval thresholds and together totaling $190,940. Two HOME-ARP grants totaling $1.51 million — $870,446 to Empowering Reach Foundation and $641,078 to Fair Housing Foundation — were pulled from the agenda and received no vote. Approximately a dozen residents addressed the council against the active preferential permit parking enforcement in Richland Farms, citing improper ordinance rollout, ticketing errors on handicap-permitted vehicles, and inadequate community notice; the discussion was tabled for a future workshop without a vote, and Councilmember Spicer confirmed enforcement remained in effect through adjournment.

Dec 23, 2025

city council

The council's largest spending approval was $884,333 to Greenfields Outdoor Fitness Inc. for Greenleaf Parkway outdoor fitness equipment, passed 5-0; the city manager noted the contract contained a copy-paste error naming Fig & Oleander Park instead of Greenleaf Parkway and stated staff would correct it before signing. Three additional action items passed 5-0: $243,663 to Innovative Playgrounds Co., Inc. for Fig & Oleander Park playground work; $214,977 to End Point Wireless Inc. for security cameras at five parks; and $173,431 to JMC2 Engineering + Surveying for a second amendment to an engineering services agreement at the Alameda–State Route 91 corridor. On consent (5-0, no item-level discussion), the council approved $210,208 to WestNet, Inc. for a fire alerting system and $70,000 (recurring) to Waxie Enterprises for equipment and supplies; pulled from consent for separate 5-0 votes were $250,000 (recurring) to Oppenheimer Investigations Group, Norman A. Traub & Associates, and Jackson Lewis P.C. for investigation and legal services — the city manager stated existing vendors were over capacity — and $86,420 (recurring) to ESRI plus $46,359 to Versatile for GIS software, with Versatile's amount sitting just below the $50,000 council approval threshold; the State Water Resources Control Board collected $57,543 across two separate consent line items ($36,393 for a stormwater permit fee and $21,150 for a sewer overflow permit fee, both recurring). Approximately twelve members of the public addressed the council during general public comment, with multiple speakers demanding censure of Councilmember Spicer over credit card use currently under active DA investigation, several disputing the terms of the city attorney's departure settlement, and Richland Farms residents requesting postponement of preferential parking enforcement pending production of District 3 records.

Sep 9, 2025

city council

The council's largest spending approval was an open purchase order not to exceed $75,000 to Van Dermyden Makus Law Corporation for investigative and legal services, passed 5-0; the city manager stated the firm had already performed services without a contract due to 'logistical errors' and was unable to provide the outstanding prior-year invoice amount when asked — the firm appeared across three separate line items totaling $75,780, a split-payment pattern flagged in the structured agenda. A $70,670 agreement with UCLA Center for Prehospital Care for fire department nurse educator services, split across two line items ($70,560 and $110), was approved 5-0. A General Fund budget amendment passed 4-1 (Darden the sole no vote), allocating three amounts including $96,324 — flagged as sitting just below the $100,000 council approval threshold — along with $85,501 and $4,953; Darden objected to resolution sections placing city attorney-related positions within the mayor and council's budget department. The City Treasurer's fourth quarter investment report, showing $10.74M in interest earnings on a $315.56M portfolio, was received and filed 5-0 and was not a spending approval. Approximately thirteen residents addressed the council during public comment, with several raising fire department paramedic staffing shortages; the fire chief, brought forward by the city manager, disputed the severity of the staffing situation described by Battalion Chief Hernandez.

Jul 22, 2025

city council

The council's largest single spending approval was a recurring $800,000 contract to the City of Downey for fire and emergency medical dispatching services, approved 5-0; prior meeting records show Compton has paid Downey for this service since at least 2008 when the contract stood at $381,755, a figure that climbed to $850,000 in 2019 before this year's authorization, with individual calls billed at an additional $63 each. The 5-0 consent vote bundled $150,000 distributed across three fire apparatus vendors, $125,000 to Life Assist Medical Supplies, $120,000 to Jankovich Company for fuel, and $90,000 to Gateway Cities Council of Governments split into three transportation study payments—the largest individual COG payment ($45,000) sits just below the council's $50,000 approval threshold—while Item 6, a $50,000 budget allocation for agenda format changes, was tabled without a vote. Price Paige & Company LLP received approval for CPA services totaling $141,006 structured as three sub-$100,000 line items ($68,050, $36,478, and $36,478), a payment structure the agenda analysis flagged as a possible split; the council also authorized a housing development agreement at 1434 W. Compton Boulevard—under negotiation since 2020—involving $6.10M and $1.40M in city expenditures alongside $12.75M from the National Housing Trust Fund, passing 4-0-1 with Council Member Darden abstaining. A budget amendment creating new classified positions—including purchasing manager and civil engineering assistant roles tied to 2022 state auditor recommendations—passed 5-0, drawing $127,271 from the Local Housing Authority Fund and $30,000 from the General Fund; approximately fifteen members of the public addressed the council, with several speakers directing alarm at a separately presented, non-voted $40 million self-insurance fund deficit and at the absence of the elected city treasurer from the session.

Jul 1, 2025

city council

The council's only spending action was approval of $4,878 in in-kind expenditures from the General Fund for the 22nd Annual Compton Stand Down for Veterans (September 19–21, 2025), with no recipient vendors named in the agenda; the item also carried three identical $813.04 budget allocations split across Council District 1, Council District 4, and the Mayor's overtime expense accounts — three separate account lines for the same amount, a split-payment structure worth noting. The consent item passed 3-0-1, with Councilwoman Bowers abstaining and Councilmember Darden absent; Bowers stated on the record that she objected to approving in-kind support for this event while the council had denied comparable support to the Compton Kids Club, calling out what she described as inconsistent treatment of nonprofits. The council also designated Councilman Andre Spicer as Mayor Pro Tem for fiscal year 2025–2026, a rotation required by CMC Section 2.1.16 that the city attorney confirmed did not require a vote; the elected city attorney disputed the legal opinion cited by the mayor, stating that any valid opinion must come through his office, not from outside counsel. At least eight members of the public addressed the council, with several speakers contesting Spicer's eligibility to hold a council seat, and others raising concerns about ICE enforcement procedures at city parks, nonprofit grant oversight, and fireworks enforcement.

Jun 17, 2025

city council

The council tabled both the FY2025-2026 citywide budget ($262.32M total, $89.71M from the General Fund) — deferred at Council Member Darden's request to verify corrections — and a proposed $164,550 project management contract with Weaver and Tidwell LLP for ERP software implementation, deferred pending a direct vendor presentation to the council. Two additional payments to auditor Eadie and Payne were approved: $23,416 from the General Fund for out-of-scope work on the completed FY2022-2023 audit (4-0-1, Spicer abstaining) and $18,522 from the General Fund for anticipated out-of-scope work on the FY2023-2024 audit (5-0); both amounts are part of a repeat-vendor pattern spanning two agenda items, the $23,416 amount sits just below the city's $25,000 approval threshold, and the auditor acknowledged during Item 6's discussion that the work had been completed before the council authorized payment, without the prior written approval required by contract. On-call administrative investigation services agreements with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore ($440) and JL Group LLC ($450), pulled from the consent agenda by Council Member Duart for separate discussion, passed 5-0. The FY2022-2023 audited financial statements (Item 1) are an informational item carrying no spending approval; the presentation disclosed 18 audit findings — most recurring — and the item was tabled after the city treasurer and city controller publicly disputed conflicting investment earnings figures in the management discussion and analysis, with no members of the public addressing that item directly.

Apr 30, 2025

city council

No new spending was approved at this April 30 special meeting; the sole action item was a resolution to rescind Resolution 26,231, which the council had passed one week earlier on April 22 designating law firm Lashare & Winder as special counsel at $325/hour for general services and $375/hour for litigation — the same firm that already held a retainer contract signed in October 2024. The meeting was dominated by competing legal opinions on whether the April 22 action constituted a Brown Act violation: Lashare & Winder attorney Sonny Sutani argued no violation occurred, while Deputy City Attorney Merle Green argued there were multiple violations that day, including an improperly noticed subsequent-need item and an unagendized presentation by Sutani. The original motion to rescind, moved by Council Member Duhart and seconded by Council Member Bowers, was withdrawn; a substitute motion to modify rather than rescind Resolution 26,231 without admitting a Brown Act violation passed 5-0 (Duhart yes, Spicer yes, Bowers yes, Darton yes, Sharif yes), with a closed session and subsequent public vote scheduled for May 6. Seven members of the public spoke during public comment, the majority raising concerns about the Brown Act dispute, the appointment process, and spending on legal representation. A pattern flagged during discussion: the city carries approximately five to six active outside counsel contracts, and Sutani stated at least two of those contracts bill at $450/hour, above the council's own $440/hour resolution cap — a claim Green disputed.

Mar 25, 2025

city council

No new spending was approved at this meeting; both consent-agenda spending items were tabled without a vote. The city manager stated that a $272,305 expenditure to Creative Bus Sales for two Dial-A-Ride buses (FY2020 CDBG funds) and a $697,517 contract to Innovative Playgrounds Co., Inc. for Lueders Park playground equipment replacement (FY2022 CDBG funds) each require a 4/5 council vote, and only three members were present at the dais — no vote tally was recorded on either item because neither came to a vote. One public commenter noted that the Innovative Playgrounds contract amount had been reduced from a figure closer to $700,000, placing the final amount $2,483 below that mark; no explanation for the reduction appears in the agenda materials or transcript. Approximately eleven residents addressed the council during public comment on topics including street conditions, senior Dial-A-Ride bus service, homeless abatement, and a digital signage permit dispute — no council votes were taken on any of those matters. The remainder of the meeting consisted of an informational Women's History Month certificate ceremony with no spending attached.

Jan 14, 2025

city council

The council's largest spending approval was a recurring $800,000 contract with the City of Downey for fire and emergency medical dispatching services, passed on the consent agenda 4-0 (Darden absent); the same vote covered three recurring regulatory and consulting payments — $53,975 to the State Water Resources Control Board, $34,050 to Price Paige & Company LLP for a CPA contract amendment, and $33,012 to the California Department of Industrial Relations — with one resident, Fidel Marquez, publicly opposing the Price Paige item during public comment. A $416,428 amendment to a construction contract with MDJ Management LLC for security upgrades at 404 N. Alameda passed 4-0 (Darden absent) following a presentation by Director Ward citing scope additions — drainage retention basins, ADA sidewalks, and interior cameras — not anticipated when the project was authorized in June 2023; Ward stated the project is approximately 80% complete. A $28,799 General Fund purchase order to HDL for municipal tax and audit consulting passed 4-0 (Darden absent); both HDL and Price Paige & Company LLP are General Fund consulting vendors approved at the same meeting, and HDL's amount falls just under $30,000. No new spending was approved for the Olympics/Tourism Committee ordinance (first reading only, no vote taken) or the exclusive negotiation agreement with the Wind Project for 21 affordable units at 1716 E. Rosecrans (4-0, Darden absent), though the Wind Project ENA drew multiple public objections in the concurrent successor agency session.

Oct 8, 2024

city council

No new spending was approved at the October 8, 2024 Compton City Council meeting. The council took two action votes: Item 3, a 5-0 approval designating the city manager as the authorized agent with FEMA and Cal OES for disaster-related financial assistance (no spending attached); and Item 4, approving a 12-month lease of city-owned property at 202 North Long Beach Boulevard to nonprofit Sylvia Nunn Angels — Councilman Spicer moved Option B, setting the rate at $1 per year rather than the agenda's standard rate of $3,492 per month ($41,904 annually), with Duhart, Spicer, Darden, and Mayor Sharif recorded as yes and Bowers' vote absent from the transcript; agenda materials listed Sylvia Nunn Angels in two separate line items totaling $45,396, representing the same deal expressed as both an annual figure ($41,904) and a monthly rate ($3,492). The remainder of the meeting was informational: a United Way of Greater LA presenter projected $825,888 annually flowing directly to Compton and approximately $23 million to the Gateway Cities COG if Measure A passes in November — revenue projections tied to a ballot measure, not city spending approvals — and Councilwoman Duhart separately noted the city treasurer generated over $10 million in interest earnings, also not a spending decision. Eleven residents addressed the council during public comment, raising concerns about illegal dumping, potholes, the Artesia Bridge construction timeline, prostitution along Long Beach Boulevard, gang violence, and the disputed legal basis of a District 1 council appointment.

Sep 10, 2024

city council

The council approved two contracts: $123,597 to St. Nick's Christmas Lighting and Decor for holiday decoration installation and removal (5-0), and $102,932 to BluLynx Solutions LLC for grant administrative services (four council members recorded yes; Bowers's vote is not captured in the transcript). A third item — the appointment of Charles Scott as Interim Senior Building Inspector, structured retroactively to October 2023 — was pulled without a vote after Councilwoman Darden cited a typographic error in the resolution, a missing government code attachment, and insufficient clarification on the retroactive arrangement; Councilman Spicer withdrew his motion before any second was recorded, and the item is scheduled to return the following week. During Item 6 discussion, Councilwoman Darden noted that the three competing bids were approximately double the St. Nick's figure; no members of the public addressed either spending item. The council also voted 5-0 to reschedule the Republic Services performance review hearing to October 10, 2024, and approved three sets of prior meeting minutes on consent (5-0); five members of the public addressed the council during open comment, raising concerns that included a charter-compliance dispute over the District 1 council appointment that the city attorney had found to be in violation, a week-long street lighting outage, and road conditions on Wilmington Avenue.

Jun 18, 2024

city council

The council approved $33,880 to Day Wireless Systems for 50 Code Enforcement portable radios (consent, 5-0) and $775 in General Fund travel for elected officials to the League of California Cities conference (5-0); five larger spending items totaling more than $1.7 million — including a $600,000 tree-trimming purchase order to United Pacific Services, a $322,839 ARPA-funded contract with Cla-Val Company, a $651,950 EV charging station purchase with ChargePoint Inc. split across three line items (flagged as a repeat vendor), a $48,688 two-line-item consulting contract with MGT of America, and a fire chief vehicle purchase with competing bids from three Chevrolet dealerships ranging $81,080–$84,787 — were on the agenda but not acted upon before the meeting was continued. A fireworks permit vote for eleven nonprofit applicants failed: Spicer voted yes, Duhart, Bowers, and Darden abstained, and Mayor Sharif voted no, after approximately nine members of the public addressed the item, the majority opposing the permits. A public hearing on placing roughly 130 delinquent commercial water accounts on the Los Angeles County tax roll was pulled after Republic Services' designated presenter left the chambers before making a presentation, drawing objections from approximately eight speakers. The meeting was continued to the following week following a floor dispute between the city attorney and city manager over the city attorney's right to deliver an oral report from the dais, with the continuation passing on a 2-yes tally (Duhart and Mayor Sharif), Spicer and Darden absent, and Bowers' vote unrecorded in the transcript.

May 28, 2024

city council

The largest new spending approval was $373,857 to Vincor Construction, Inc. for facility renovations funded from the Insurance Recovery Fund, with Duhart, Spicer, Darden, and Mayor Sharif voting yes — Bowers's vote was not captured in the transcript; the structured agenda lists Vincor across four line items on the same agenda item, including additional contract figures of $169,239 and $155,854, with total flagged Vincor amounts reaching approximately $1.07 million. The council also approved a $58,000 purchase order to Republic Services for compost and mulch (5-0) — a vendor appearing in two identical $58,000 line items on the same agenda item, totaling $116,000 and flagged as a possible split payment — and a $34,989 purchase order to Quinn Company for an outstanding invoice and maintenance services (5-0), structured across four sub-items summing to $104,967, also flagged as a possible split payment. A $20,026 contract with Mars Environmental for environmental disposal, drawn from the Public Works Street Maintenance Equipment Rental Fund Balance, was pulled from consent by Councilperson Duhart, who noted that fund balance information was absent from the staff report, and then approved 5-0; the city attorney's oral report separately disclosed two previously authorized litigation settlements — $3,975,000 in Leggett v. City of Compton and $1,500 in Rogers v. City of Compton — neither of which was a new spending decision at this meeting. A proposed five-year lease with Angels for Sight was pulled before any vote by the mayor, who cited legal issues that surfaced after the agenda was posted. Six residents addressed the council during public comment, raising concerns about business licensing processes, meeting minutes accuracy, street and tree maintenance, prostitution on Long Beach Boulevard, pothole repair material quality, and vendor oil disposal into storm drains.

Apr 2, 2024

city council

The council's largest spending approvals were $328,900 to Risher Sutherland, Inc. dba United Contractors, Inc. for a roof replacement at Fire Station 1 and $108,905 to TechCoat Contractors, Inc. for a pedestrian coating system at Fire Stations 1 and 3, both approved 4-0 with no council discussion. The council also approved $45,000 to Future Buildings for a fire department metal storage structure — $5,000 below the council's $50,000 approval threshold — and $20,000 to Eadie and Payne, LLP across two line items ($15,000 multi-year contract plus $5,000 purchase order), both 4-0 with no discussion; Eadie and Payne is a recurring vendor appearing in two entries on this agenda. The council accepted a $37,800 grant from the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation and separately approved $27,000 to Harold Johnson as a youth program coordinator, 4-0; a $254.95 payment to Staples Advantage for office supplies from prior fiscal years was also approved 4-0, with the city manager stating it required council approval because the original purchase order had been exceeded. The development agreement authorizing City Ventures Home Building LLC to develop a 60-unit for-sale housing project at 930 W. Compton Blvd. passed 3-0-1 (Darden abstaining) after an extended procedural dispute between Councilmember Bowers and the city attorney over whether the vote constituted the first or second reading of the ordinance. Approximately eleven members of the public addressed the council during the general comment period, with multiple speakers raising concerns about the City Ventures project, HOA enforcement in existing developments, infrastructure conditions citywide, and park access.